Welcome!

Welcome to Life in the Middle. This is a blog created by me, Karry Santiago, a seventh grade science teacher that has been teaching middle school since 1997. I have a degree in biology from U.C. Riverside and earned my credential from UCR as well. I am currently working on my master's degree from Walden University. I will be using this blog as a place for middle school teachers and students to share their ideas, opinions, and stories. I hope to have my students up and blogging soon.

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Constructivism in Practice

               

             Constructionists believe that knowledge is actively constructed in the mind of the learner when they are actively engaged in creating an artifact that they can share (Orey, 2001). In a constructionist classroom, the teacher acts as a facilitator of learning rather than the giver of knowledge. The students learn by doing, using a hands-on approach to learning.  The classroom would be student centered where the teacher acts as a coach and motivator.  A constructionist classroom will utilize rubrics, dialogue, multiple strategies, inquiry, projects, and collaboration (Orey, 2001). These tools focus on what the student is learning rather than what the teacher is teaching. One strategy teachers can use to create a constructionist classroom is by utilizing project based learning.

                Project based learning; PBL is an instructional strategy that has students find solutions to problems in real world context (Orey, 2001). PBL is usually used in a collaborative learning environment where a group of students are trying to find a solution to the given problem. There is an emphasis on creating an artifact as part of the solution to the problem.  For PBL to work, students must feel that the work is relevant to them. The teacher must be available for students to help guide them and motivate them. The teacher cannot just give the solution to the students. There are three phases for PBL. During the first stage, students choose their project; during the second stage students create their artifact, and in the third stage students share their artifact (Orey, 2001).

                Generating and testing hypotheses, allows students to engage in complex mental processes, apply content knowledge, and enhance their understanding (Pitler, Hubbell, & Kuhn, 2012). This strategy is a form of problem solving which could be incorporated into PBL. Students could test their hypotheses and create an artifact of their conclusions. There are four processes for testing hypotheses; analysis, problem solving, inquiry, and investigation (Pitler et al, 2012). These processes are similar to the characteristics of constructionism. Technology is an important factor in generating and testing hypotheses. Graphic organizers are a useful tool in showing the relationships between factors.  Cacoo is a useful site that students and teachers can use to create graphic organizers, flow charts, and concept maps. 


                  A data collection tool that students could use is a microscope. A microscope can be used to see the pollution in water, count bacteria, observe living specimen, or check the health of an ecosystem. Students can use the data collected to help answer their problem. The internet is also a helpful tool for collecting data. Students can find other data collected by scientists all over the world and compare their results to what they found. Simulations allow students to test their hypotheses without the danger or ethical dilemma that may be created by their tests. There are many sites available for simulations for students and teachers to use. These sites also allow students to see the possible outcomes very quickly instead of over a long period of time.
                I plan to incorporate more PBL opportunities into my classroom next year. Due to a lack of available technology, it has been difficult to utilize computers as much as I would like to. Next year, my school will have six computer labs instead of just the two we have this year.  I want students to create concept maps and flow charts to show the relationships between the ideas they are learning about. Life science builds upon itself throughout the year. We start with the cell and build throughout the year until we end up with the human body. A concept map that they can refer to all year and add to it as we complete a unit will help students to see the big picture. I already have students test hypotheses but I need to create an activity that is more open ended and will allow students more freedom to find the answers. 

 Useful site for creating concept maps:

Useful site for interactive simulations:

References
Orey, M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using technology with classroom instruction that works (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

3 comments:

  1. Karry,
    I’m finding here that teacher interaction is still at an all-time high when regarding constructivism. I’m desperately trying my best to find a solution to have the students take on some level of responsibility for knowing vocabulary, grammar or definitions. It’s difficult, but in conjunction with the behaviorist reward and shaping theory, it’s slowly working in some ways. I’m glad to see your school is going to have six computer labs in the future. Back in my Life science I remember being in a partnered lab environment which was great but often lacked in the use of computers as well. I know exactly the inherent complexity the Life Sciences have as a part of its learning. I could imagine you could break it up into smaller parts. If there were a true concept map based on the life sciences, it would certainly be a very large file. Could it be possible to shift the whole learning experience of life Sciences to exclusively be a concept map? My thoughts are no, there still requires a great deal of traditional learning.

    David

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi David,

      Of course a concept map would never work as the whole learning experience. I was thinking of a simple one to show how life science builds upon itself from simple to more complex. I agree that there needs to be some emphasis on vocabulary in many subjects especially in science. I have students do vocabulary on a weekly basis on words that they need to know in order to be more successful. I do not just have them copy definitions. They must also use the word in a sentence and draw a picture for the word. I also believe that some behaviorism is still necessary in classrooms in order for students to know how they are expected to behave in class. Even my seventh graders will fill out their agenda each day because they want their stamp on Friday. They still love stickers too.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete